In the last 20 Years four new deep wells were drilled to
develop a scientific HDR/EGS prototype at Soultz sous
Forêts, three old oil wells were deepened into the
granite to observe seismicity during hydraulic
stimulations and one additional seismic observation well
was completely new drilled. In 1997 the upper reservoir
or the “stimulated down hole heat exchanger” was
tested at app. 3.5 km depth using a doublet in between
GPK1 and GPK2. After the deepening of GPK2 and the
drilling and stimulation of the wells GPK3 and GPK4
the deeper reservoir at 5 km was investigated using a
triplet with two production wells. The first step in every
drilling operation is the choice of the right size of the
drilling rig with a good safety margin and fitting the
wellbore planning. During all drilling operations at Soultz
this was the case. During times with high oil prices the
availability of drilling rigs is not sufficient anymore,
therefore, sometimes bigger rigs than necessary are
used and the drilling costs are rising unnecessarily. In
Soultz always standard oil field hole sizes were
drilled (for example drilling 17 ½” and running 13 3/8”
casing or drilling 12 ¼” and running 9 5/8” casing) to
reduce the costs and to maximize the availability
of spare parts or additional (fishing) tools.
Massive hydraulic stimulation is the key to develop and
run an HDR/EGS power plant at economical costs
because the natural permeability is not high enough
within the deep granite at Soultz. Therefore the wells
need to be able to resist the thermal cycles while
cooling during injection and while heating during
production. The wells at Soultz were completed with an
uncemented internal casing which is only supported at
the bottom by open hole casing cupper nickel packers
and a short cementation. Thermal expansion and
contraction, of the otherwise self-supporting pipes
(during injection and production experiments),
are compensated in the well head assembly using high
temperature Aflas or Viton ring seal pack-offs. Both the
casing packers and the wellhead seals were
developed and improved in Soultz during the last years
in order to obtain a usable well completion at
reasonable cost.
The used bottom hole assemblies and drilling bits at
Soultz were improved during the last years therefore
longer life times at the same penetration rates
of the used drilling equipment could be performed.
During directional drilling with a mud motor no
improvement of the drilling performance was observed.
Therefore the amount of motor runs was minimized to
the risk of the high “lost in hole” prices. The
abrasiveness of the Soultz granites as well as the fact
that it varies on short distances in grain size, alteration
and number of fractures per meter PDC-bits were not
used. The friction within the highly abrasive granite
did not allow using integral blade stabilizers for hole
size control. Roller reamers were used instead to
control the well path with a slick, packed or
pendulum bottom hole assembly. The weak point during
directional drilling within the Soultz granite was the
number of failures of the MWD equipment.
While mud circulation within the granite there is only
minor cooling of the formation observed, because the
matrix porosity of the granite is zero. The
combination of temperature and the vibration of the drill
string reduced the life time of the electronic boards
within the down hole equipment of the MWD used.
The granite within the Rhine Graben is highly fractured
and a natural water convection exists down to a depth
of probably around 10 km. While drilling within these
fractures losses and gains were observed in the drilling
mud system. A low cost clear brine water mud was used
to avoid losses and gains balancing the mud and
formation fluid densities up to the second digit behind
the Komma.
|