The alternatives for the selection of the power production cycle for the Husavik
plant are discussed. The role of effectiveness and efficiency in such a selection
is explained, as well as the reason for selectin a cycle with regeneration. A
comparison is made between the best alternatives.
The Kalina power plant in Husavik is the described, and the operating experience for
the last six years presented.
Finally the undergoing modification of the plant is presented, a modification which
will increase the power to 15% over the original target.
|